I agreeto Idea Updating the Section 508 standards - 1194.2
Voting is Disabled

7 votes

I disagree

Rank49

Idea#27

This idea is active.
Product Accessibility »

Updating the Section 508 standards - 1194.2

Section 508 as it relates to technology (1194.21, 1194.22) should be evaluated and updated on a regular basis. Technology changes rapidly, and the standards are sorely outdated. This means meeting these standards as a software vendor while still enhancing and advancing the product is difficult and costly. It can also result in poor overall user experience by government employees because it may limit the advancements that can be made.

For example, there are some excellent screen readers that have kept up with technology changes, and the software is fully accessible by people with disabilities who use these screen readers. They have adapted to things like advanced CSS and javascript - yet the standards still state the software must run without CSS. This made sense 10 or 15 years ago, but is no longer applicable today. Much of CSS drives product function, not just color and font size. Time and resources are spent with agencies and vendors debating back and forth over this outdated standard that cannot be met while still delivering excellent software. This is just one example.

Technology is constantly changing, and the standards cannot remain unchanged over time. Please consider establishing a committee to evaluate and update these standards every few years. This will also raise the bar and set higher expectations for assistive technology to keep up with software advancements. In the end, everyone wins.

Submitted by RJordan 1 year ago

Vote Activity Show

Events

  1. The idea was posted
    1 year ago

Comments (4)

  1. Absolutely! How can we keep the regs at least within shouting distance of the technologies? It's been proposed to do a "Rolling Refresh". That means prioritizing those regs that are in the most jeopardy of failing due to technological evolution, and revising them or issuing authoritative guidance about them via a more rapid process than usual federal rulemaking.

    1 year ago
    2
    0
  2. A better solution may be to have broader standards (like WCAG) that are adapted through agency collaboration. Some agencies have adapted the current Section 508 standards to modern technologies. If agencies adopt common methodologies, they can apply and update adaptation without being burdened by a lengthy rule making process.

    1 year ago
    1
    0
    1. Yes -- competent and timely authoritative interpretation of existing provisions would be better than refreshing regs so slowly.

      1 year ago
      1
      0
    2. Suggest additions to the strategic plan that assign parties responsible for common interpretations, encourage agency adoption (the strategic plan cannot legally mandate it), and define common/best practice testing methodologies. Maybe some funding would be nice too?

      1 year ago
      1
      0